Home
Blood on the Path
Cycling
Books
Biographies
Humour
Travels
Writing
Journalism
Reading
Short Stories
Leisure
Features
Columns
Diaries
Contact Us
Links
Site Map
Copyright

Popular

Favourite Writings
 
Log In





Lost Password?

Friday, 30 July 2010
Home arrow Humour arrow BEST TEN No. Four

BEST TEN No. Four

A fine vintage

The surprisingly difficult task of selecting ‘No 4’ from the rich field of writers in the English-language has convinced me that the best must be judged – not by their wit and ability to produce laughs- but by their talents as great writers, with unrivalled skills in capturing in print the elusive and intangible qualities of humour.  They must be writers whose words and imagery, once experienced, will stay with us most of our lives.

Even then, justifying any selection of only 10 remains almost impossible. However, by excluding those humorists judged to be ‘satirists’ provides some relief.  Number Four in the field then becomes self-evident. . . if you overlook the fact that his work contains much delicious satire.
And if you will accept the fact there are exceptions to all rules - and parameters - because only the work, not the life, of my fourth choice survived in the 20th century.

In the 1700s Henry Fielding kept a diary, posthumously published (also in the 1700s) as Journal of a Voyage to Lisbon, described by a general editor of his work, Malcolm Elwin, as “one of the most delightfully readable short books in the literature of travel”. And this opinion was delivered more than 200 years after Fielding’s death!

Fielding - born in 1707,the son of a canon in Salisbury and grandson of an Earl - has been credited for being ‘father of the English-language novel”. There are other claimants, but what is not in doubt is that he was, and still is, among the best writers of humour, ever. His skill, his satire, irony and comic plots combine to make this so.

As Thackeray deduced in another century, Fielding was “himself the hero of his books: he is wild Tom Jones.” Debonair in manner, brilliant in wit, physically strong and handsome, he enjoyed the same success with women as did his characters.   He knew what he was writing about.

William Hogarth, his only contemporary peer as a social satirist, was his intimate for twenty years. But Fielding made few friends among the literati, and he was maligned in his private character by the spite of Smollett and Horace Walpole and in his literary reputation by the prejudice of Samuel Johnson. Fielding has surpassed them all.

Few novelists compete with him in craftsmanship, according to Malcolm Elwin, who was the general editor of a series of Classical literature published in the 1950s. This is quickly appreciated as you keep turning the pages of Tom Jones, a lengthy book first published in 1749, and made into a lengthy, but unforgettable movie about 230 years later.
The film is meticulous in its portrayal of Fielding’s plot, for the plot itself is brilliant in that its neat strategy is revealed and played out only in the last 50 pages of an 800-page book.

In the early 1800’s, Samuel Coleridge exclaimed: "What a master of composition Fielding was! Upon my word I think the Oedipus Tyrannus, The Alchemist, and Tom Jones, the three most perfect plots ever planned."

William Makepeace Thackeray wrote in The English Humourists:
"As a picture of manners, the novel of Tom Jones is indeed exquisite: as a work of construction quite a wonder: the by­play of wisdom; the power of observation; the multiplied felicitous turns and thoughts; the vaned character of the great Comic Epic; keep the reader in a perpetual admiration and curiosity. But against Mr. Thomas Jones himself we have a right to put in a protest. . . I can't say that I think Mr. Jones a virtuous character."

Thackeray was a Victorian, and duty-bound to express horror at the sexual antics of Fielding’s hero.
"Since the author of Tom Jones was buried, no writer of fiction among us,” wrote Thackeray, “has been permitted to depict to his utmost power a man.  We must drape him, and give him a certain conventional simper. Society will not tolerate the Natural in our Art."                        .

Fielding was in fact "the founder of a new province of writing", as he the author himself explains in his running commentary to his readers as the plots unfold. . His explanations can be seen as a precursor of such works as Stevenson's essays on the art of writing and Somerset Maugham's story of his literary development in The Summing Up, according to Elwin*.

"He is a great inventor, an unrivalled craftsman, a perfect master of his material," wrote W. E. Henley; "his novels teem with ripe wisdom and generous conclusions and beneficent examples."

Byron fairly called Henry Fielding ‘the prose Homer of human nature,’ and Tom Jones is his Odyssey, concluded the general editor of Macdonald Illustrated Classics in mid-20th century.

The sources for a study of Fielding's life and work are contained in the two massive volumes of Henry Fielding, His Life, Works, and Times, by Dr. F. Homes Dudden, 1952.
Editions of all Fielding's works were edited by George Saintsbury in 1893 and published in London in 12 volumes.   In 1903 Fielding’s works were edited by W. E. Henley and published in  New York, in 16 volumes.

Brief excerpts from Tom Jones appear next so that you may be reminded of his robust humour, and be tempted to read, or re-read, his work, and to make your own judgements.

 
 
< Prev   Next >

   
 
© 2010 Writing Inc.
Site designed and hosted by www.overberginfo.com